I wasn’t quite sure what to expect when I picked up Northanger Abbey. Austen’s charm I was expecting, of course, but I wasn’t sure what her spoof was going be like. I began reading, and I must admit, for the first half of this very short novel I’d completely forgotten that it was supposed to be Gothic in scope. However, it is clear right from the start that Austen was working with an anti-heroine. Of course, while such heroines we find in plenty these days, I’m sure, at the time Austen wrote, beauty and various accomplishments were the standard requirements of a heroine. One only needs to read the Grimm Brothers and Hans Christian Anderson to know how true this is. But, right at the start, we are introduced to a young Catherine who is an absolute ‘plain Jane’ and a tom boy to boot. She has no accomplishments whatsoever, and does not seem to be in the least interested in acquiring any. She is content with who and what she is, and later loses herself in volumes of romances that her parents wonder are perhaps not good for her.
We see the effects of all her novel-reading when she sets off with her kind neighbours, the Allens, to seek her fortune (in the heroic sense of the term though she has no such thought in her head) in the society of Bath. She meets with a couple of families there, one of which provides the hero to the story. Harry Tilney is unlike the usual romantic hero. He reads novels, finds them entertaining, loves to laugh and goof about, and has no dark or gloomy or brooding past. The Gothic-ness of the novel begins when the Tilneys invite Catherine, half way through the novel, to come over to their home for a stay. She discovers that they live in an abbey and she is simply delighted, immediately thinking of all the ghoulish adventures open to her.
At the end, with no real adventure to find her, Catherine lets all her knowledge from the books she has read to come to play on her “sensibilities”. *spoiler alert* She finds a mysterious, ‘hidden’ cabinet in her room with a roll of papers secreted away in a hidden compartment, she ‘discovers’ that the master of the house (General Tilney) is loath to open up the rooms of his dead wife to Catherine which immediately leads her to suspect that perhaps his wife is not dead at all but is a prisoner within those ancient rooms, she ‘experiences’ the tell-tale weather of all Gothic romances, and generally sends herself into near hysteria with all her imaginings. *end of spoiler* Later, of course, she is made to see the error of her ways and is quite embarrassed to find that she was carried away by all her reading.
I simply enjoyed the way Austen wrote this entire spoof. It was charming and witty, and I don’t think I’ve ever chuckled so much while reading any of her other books. Right from the beginning to the end of Northanger Abbey I was well and truly entertained. There is mention of a great many books and writers in this novel (I’ve never seen so much mention of her literary contemporaries or fore-bearers, actually, hardly any, in her other novels), and I was soon under the impression that most of the spoofing was based off Anne Radcliffe‘s books – the one that gets mentioned most often and is our heroine’s favourite is The Mysteries of Udolpho. However, I did not get the impression that Austen despised the Gothic genre. In fact, she seemed to be a fan of Mrs Radcliffe, who was just amusing herself with gently poking fun at what she admired.
Northanger Abbey, is very different from the other Austen novels I’ve read (I’ve read all except Mansfield Park and Lady Susan). Besides its aim at being a spoof, it lacks the maturity of her other novels – not just in terms of style and her wit, which becomes more subtle and thereby sharp, but also in terms of the themes she deals with in her later books (yes, Northanger Abbey was meant to have been published in 1803…eight years before Sense and Sensibility, her first published work).
There are some who claim that reading Mrs Radcliffe’s Mysteries of Udolpho would help us to better understand and appreciate Northanger Abbey. But personally, I feel, that if you’ve ready even one or two Gothic novels from any era, you are bound to understand this novel really well. While I have yet to read Mrs Radcliffe, I have read the likes of Jane Eyre, Dracula, a couple of Victoria Holt books (all of them are Gothic) and have watched a couple of versions of Rebecca; and knowing these was enough for me to understand all the Gothic elements that Austen gently mocks at in her novel.
Would you like a brief introduction to The Musteries of Udolpho? Then read these posts by other bloggers:
The Mysteries of Udolpho and Northanger Abbey by Shannon – this is a very well-written account of Udolpho and a good comparison between the same and Northanger Abbey.
Entering Volume II of the Mysteries of Udolpho - Jillian’s account of her first encounter with Radcliffe’s novel.
This post has been written mainly for the Gothic Lit Classic Circuit Tour. You will find other posts for today at:
One Librarian’s Book Reviews – She’s posting about Udolpho!
Book Clutter – a review on The Castle of Otranto by Walpole
A Literary Odyssey – The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner – James Hogg


I was hoping to read this for the R.I.P. Challenge, but I just haven’t got to it. Too much I want to read and not enough time!
Oh, I should pop on over sometime and see what you’ve been reading for RIP. I wasn’t too sure I could handle more than a book or two for this challenge. I’m quite pleased with myself for managing Northanger Abbey and Sleepy Hollow!
Thanks for stopping by!
I agree with you–I thought it was a lot of fun and so different from her other books. Also about the immaturity in writing–although that was fun to experience too; I think it provided a larger glimpse at who Austen actually was. Lady Susan is again very unlike her other works, and yet also very fun to read.
I have as yet to read Lady Susan. I’m actually hoping to listen to an audio reading of Love and Freindship sometime in November. I managed to read a couple of chapters/epistles from it and thought it a rather immediate precursor to Northanger Abbey. I should like to try Lady Susan as well!
Great review of NA. Thanks for sharing my link
Thanks Shannon!…and no problem.
Excellent review, Risa! I think you’ve described Catherine ‘to a T’ too. I think you’re quite right in noticing the difference between Northanger Abbey and Austen’s later fiction. It is less polished and less mature. While still a fun story to read, it does not attain the same quality of writing or sense of purpose that her later novels show. It is an Austen though, and is therefore always worth reading. I tend to reread Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice, Emma, and Persuasion on an almost annual basis, and much less frequently for Northanger Abbey and Mansfield Park. Kind of interesting that I don’t reread Mansfield Park all that often, because I really do like it, and think that it is one of her more complex and complicated novels. Again, it is very different, in many respects, from the rest of her oeuvre. Wonderful posting, Risa, keep up the good work! Cheers! Chris
Thank you, Chris, for your warm words of encouragement!
I had no idea Mansfield Park was a complex novel. I think I should read that one sooner rather than later then. I read Sense and Sensibility for the first time this year. Up until then Pride and Prejudice and Persuasion were favourites while I didn’t think much of Emma. It’s been years since I’ve re-read P&P and Emma….I hope to get to them again next year.
I didn’t want to read your review, since Northanger Abbey is one of my picks for the readathon tomorrow. (My first time reading it.) But just to say hello, and thanks for linking me.
No problem, Jillian!
… am looking forward to reading what you have to say.
I found this charming as well, and you’re right about Catherine being a different sort of heroine. I’m hoping to watch the mini-series adaptation for Advent with Austen this year. It should be lots of fun
Oh! I’m hoping to be able to watch the mini-series as well! …let’s see…
Cheers for the links to the mysteries of udolpho posts. I haven’t read Northanger Abbey for a very long time, but very soon i think I think I will go on an Austen kick
That’s great! Austen is irresistible, isn’t she?!
I loved NA much more this time around, simply because I’ve read a bit more of the Gothic genre, so I understand what she’s satirizing a bit better. It’s quite funny though. And what’s not to love about Henry Tilney — but those Thorpes!!! Awful!!
If you have not read Lady Susan it’s pretty hilarious also. Talk about your anti-heroines — she’s as despicable as Lady Catherine or Aunt Norris, one of Jane Austen’s nastiest creations.
The Thorpes! Especially the brother….he was the most awful of the lot!
Now you’ve got me intrigued about Lady Susan…. a heroine along the lines of Lady Catherine?….ha ha! I really should like to read this!
Absolutely fantastic review! This is my favourite Austen novel and as I’ve been reading I’ve been enthusiastically nodding my head with every point and considering re-reading it as soon as possible.
Thank you so much, Charlotte!
Oh, I need to reread this! I told Jillian that earlier, but now reading your review, I’m even more convinced of it. I kind of feel that Austen is less spoofing the Gothic genre than the over-impressionable readers of it. Maybe. It’s been a long time since I’ve read it, so I could be wrong. Certainly, I think there’s a warm feeling towards the Gothic romances–and all their silliness.